Ever noticed how people who are in
authority never ever think that that authority can be passed on to somebody
else. Most people want to stay in their positions of power believing that they
are best suited for that position and no one else can perform better than they
do.
Sometimes life creates shifts
which bring about changes that do not please us but regardless of us being pleased
or not, it doesn’t change the fact that these changes have to come. Most people
fight change and try as much to discredit new authority especially when that
authority tends to term their position irrelevant. Sometimes it is true that the new change is
bad but sometimes, a closer look inside reveals who is the worst of tyrants.
As so it was with the teachers of
the law in the times Christ. When Jesus appeared in the scene, doing things
only previously done by prophets the crème de la crème of the religious
faculties got shaken. Here is a new guy in town who is turning water into wine,
healing the sick and God knows what else he is going to do. He’s been preaching
with such authority and there’s a buzz in town all about him.
Then appears one guy who really
gives them jitters and they don’t know what to think about it all. He was
‘supposedly’ blind as from their cross examination. He claims to have met Jesus
and Jesus made mud using spit and then continued to apply it to the man’s eyes.
He later asked him to go wash in the pool of Siloam. From there the man now
claims he can see.
The teachers of the law wanted to
hear it from the man’s parents for they did not for one minute believe his
story.
Joh 9:18 But the Jewish leaders would not believe that
the man had once been blind. They sent for his parents
When the parents came, after being
summoned by the ‘authority’ of the teachers of the law they confirmed that
actually the lad had been blind but they too did not understand the
circumstances that led him to be able to see.
“Ask him, he is old enough to answer
for himself” the parents said, with a tone which suggests that they did not
like the direction that this form of questioning was headed.
They confronted the man again
about his new found ability to see and in the process wanted him to paint Jesus
as a sinner; the man just let himself go.
“Sinner or not, I don’t know (or
care), what I know is, I was blind but now I see!”
Joh 9:26 "What did he do to you?" the Jewish
leaders asked. "How did he heal your eyes?"
This next question just did it for
the once blind man. He had started to see not just literally but was able to
see what these teachers of the law really were.
“I told you once before, why do
you ask me again, do you want to be his disciples?” obviously a question with a
bit of sarcasm in it.
From there the teachers of the law
went on a rant about how they did not know nor acknowledge Jesus’ authority and
actually believed that it came from the devil.
The man found this strange, for
the teachers of the law were supposed to know these things. Anyone who came
performing miracles had to be aforementioned in scripture and it was their job
to know. He did not mince words with them because they were in a position of
perceived ‘authority’ but made them know that this was the first time in
history that a man who had been born blind had been given sight and whoever did
such a feat had to have come from God
himself.
The leaders felt cornered and
actually admitted that this man was actually teaching them. They did what every
bully does and that is to get confrontational. They insulted him and chased him
from attending their teachings.
I wouldn’t have minded if I was
the blind man for certainly what they were teaching was amiss of something.
Later after Jesus had become
popular and had done many great miracles, they plotted to kill him for they
feared that they were becoming irrelevant. They wanted to kill a sinless man
because he was going to take all their jobs and nobody was going to listen to
them again for a greater teacher had appeared.
Because they did not believe in
his teachings, they condemned themselves because the same scripture they had
used to teach in temples and in the synagogues gave the account of the coming
of Jesus. Jesus was to bring God’s children back to God by grace but those who
did not believe in grace and stuck to the law were to be judged by the law.
When this new authority came, it
came easy on sinners. All one had to do is to believe in Jesus and he was to be
saved regardless of the sins one had committed. What the teachers of the law
taught was Mosaic Laws; one’s act condemned or saved him.
They now lay condemned by their own actions yet the new authority still cried
when they crucified him.
“Forgive them for they don’t know
what they are doing”.
This new authority turned out to be their only salvation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment